Go-live approvals
A workflow runs on real work only after its owner approves the test runs.
Give good AI a clear path.
People use AI well when the approved path is also the easy one. Clear rules on what to use, a quick decision on new tools, and AI built into the work itself.
The approved path, in plain words.
Your rules say what people can use and for what, so nobody has to guess.
Which tools, for what
Which AI tools are approved, and the work each one is approved for.
What people may do on their own
Drafts, summaries and other everyday work, as long as the data stays where your rules say.
Who decides on a new tool
A named person, after a check by IT, with the decision on record.
Your rules, on every laptop.
With Grasp Govern, Pulse, a small app, runs on company laptops. People confirm your rules there, and you see which AI tools are actually in use.
The best path is the work itself.
The sprint builds AI into workflow after workflow, each with an owner and a person checking where it matters.
A record of every run
Every run and every decision, newest first. Nothing is left out.
Models you chose
Which model does which work, and where it runs. Your data is never used to train them.
Common questions
Does Pulse block tools?
No. Pulse shows what is used and asks people to confirm your rules. Grasp does the blocking: for tools people sign in to with their company account, it removes that access through your identity provider, such as Microsoft Entra. Other tools are flagged, and people see your rule.
How do people know which tools are approved?
Your rules say it in plain words, with the work each tool is approved for. With Grasp Govern, people confirm them on their own laptop.
What happens when someone needs a new tool?
A named person decides, after a check by IT, and the decision stays on record. With Grasp Govern, new tools that turn up land in one inbox.
Is this part of the sprint?
The rules and the workflows are. Pulse, and flagging the tools that need a decision, come with Grasp Govern.